|
Hey folks, Happy 2026! It’s great to be joining you on another trip around the sun as we explore data visualization, R, and reproducible research. Later today I’ll be hosting a workshop on the design of data visualizations. If you register ASAP, I can probably still get you in. If you missed this one, but would like to be notified when I run this workshop again, reply to this email and let me know! This week I found a pretty unique plot type in a paper published in the journal Nature This is Figure 2 from the open access paper titled, “Nutrient requirements of organ-specific metastasis in breast cancer” by Keene Abbott and colleagues. I’m not totally convinced of what I think of this figure yet, so stay tuned for Monday’s critique video. This is what’s called a “petal plot” since each of the wedges coming out of the center looks like a petal of a flower. I really like how they provide an interpretative key for the plots in panel b. They do the same type of thing in Figure 3. I like this because they are acknowledging that this is a novel plot type and want to help their audience interpret the figures correctly. I was surprised to see that this figure was made using GraphPad Prism! My institution threatened (once again) to cancel our site license to Prism sending shock waves of panic through campus. Whether they intend to follow through on their threats this time remains to be determined. So, I naturally wondered how I’d go about making this plot in R. FOR FREE! The most striking part of this figure are the petal plots. I know that a pie chart is a stacked bar plot in polar coordinates. I wondered whether a set of side-by-side bar plots in polar coordinates could get us the petal look. Sure enough it does! We can map the metastasis site (e.g., brain, lung, liver) to the x-axis, the level of depletion to the y-axis, and the gene (e.g., DHODH, GART) to the fill color. The bar plot can be generated using They also include 95% confidence intervals. We can get these as well using Of course, there isn’t just one petal plot. There are 18. We can match their appearance by using What do you think of petal plots? They remind me of radar or spider or web charts. Regardless, I look forward to trying to recreate and possibly offer some improvements in next week’s livestream video. If you want to get a head start, you can download the data for free from the Nature website.
|
Hey folks, It has been great to see the high level of engagement with my weekly critique videos on YouTube. I have really enjoyed making them and have learned a lot about current practices in data visualization. The one problem with these videos is that they’re a bit like an autopsy. We can figure out what went well or what didn’t work in a published figure. But we can’t do much to improve the published figure. What if we could do critiques before submitting our papers, preparing a...
Hey folks, This week I want to share with you a figure that resembles many a type of figure that I see in a lot of genomics papers. I’d consider it a data visualization meme - kind of like how you’re “required” to have a stacked bar plot if you’re doing microbiome research or a dynamite plot if you’re publishing in Nature :) This figure was included in the paper, “Impact of intensive control on malaria population genomics under elimination settings in Southeast Asia” that was published...
Hey folks! I hope you enjoyed last week’s series on the radial volcano plot (newsletter, critique video, livestream). I think it did a good job of illustrating the various reasons I think it’s valuable to recreate figures, even if we don’t like how they display the data. Something I didn’t really emphasize in last week’s newsletter was that by recreating a figure, we can make sure that the data are legit. I’m surprised by the number of signals I’ve been finding where authors using tools like...