|
Hey folks, In last week’s newsletter, I introduced a new approach that I plan on taking in these emails to help you develop your intuition with visualizing data in R (or any language). I asked you to consider a random figure that I found in the most recent issue of the journal mSphere. It’s Figure 1A from the paper, “Exploring novel microbial metabolites and drugs for inhibiting Clostridioides difficile” by Ahmed Abouelkhair and Mohamed Seleem. The figure shows the level of inhibition of bacterial growth by 527 compounds; 63 of the compounds were deemed “strong hits” because they inhibited growth by at least 90%. Without worrying about actual code, I encouraged you to think about the data and functions you’d need to generate this figure. Here were my random thoughts: This is a scatter plot with compounds giving more than 90% inhibition were a burgundy color and those with less were given a green color. There’s also a dashed line indicating the 90% threshold. It took me a minute or two to notice that the x-axis is meaningless. It’s likely the order of the compounds in their database (there seems to be a non-random pattern to the data about 3/4th the way across the axis). I also noticed that there’s no line on the x-axis, but there is a line at zero. Those are the parts of the figures, described in a way that you could probably use to make a similar looking figure with any tool. Now, how would we do this in R? Let’s start with the data. I assume that the data will be a data frame with two columns, one for the compound name ( I do everything in ggplot2 nowadays, so I start thinking about what geom I’ll use. Probably Next, I’d think about the colors. I’d use Let’s move on to the x-axis and the two lines. First, I’d use the Now let’s think about the y-axis. By default we might get the values on the y-axis that the figure already has. But to be safe, we can use I think that’s everything, right? I’d encourage you to go back through that narrative and assess what you do and don’t understand. Then look at online R resources, including my Riffomonas materials (MinimalR and generalR) and the R Graphics Cookbook for examples of how to use the new concepts. Finally, see if you can generate the figure yourself using some simulated data. The code below should be close enough to what you need:
Please let me know how this works out for you! Also, if you have a favorite figure that you'd love to see me break down, reply to this email and I'll see about using it in a future newsletter
|
Hey folks, It has been great to see the high level of engagement with my weekly critique videos on YouTube. I have really enjoyed making them and have learned a lot about current practices in data visualization. The one problem with these videos is that they’re a bit like an autopsy. We can figure out what went well or what didn’t work in a published figure. But we can’t do much to improve the published figure. What if we could do critiques before submitting our papers, preparing a...
Hey folks, This week I want to share with you a figure that resembles many a type of figure that I see in a lot of genomics papers. I’d consider it a data visualization meme - kind of like how you’re “required” to have a stacked bar plot if you’re doing microbiome research or a dynamite plot if you’re publishing in Nature :) This figure was included in the paper, “Impact of intensive control on malaria population genomics under elimination settings in Southeast Asia” that was published...
Hey folks! I hope you enjoyed last week’s series on the radial volcano plot (newsletter, critique video, livestream). I think it did a good job of illustrating the various reasons I think it’s valuable to recreate figures, even if we don’t like how they display the data. Something I didn’t really emphasize in last week’s newsletter was that by recreating a figure, we can make sure that the data are legit. I’m surprised by the number of signals I’ve been finding where authors using tools like...