|
Hey folks, In last week’s newsletter, I introduced a new approach that I plan on taking in these emails to help you develop your intuition with visualizing data in R (or any language). I asked you to consider a random figure that I found in the most recent issue of the journal mSphere. It’s Figure 1A from the paper, “Exploring novel microbial metabolites and drugs for inhibiting Clostridioides difficile” by Ahmed Abouelkhair and Mohamed Seleem. The figure shows the level of inhibition of bacterial growth by 527 compounds; 63 of the compounds were deemed “strong hits” because they inhibited growth by at least 90%. Without worrying about actual code, I encouraged you to think about the data and functions you’d need to generate this figure. Here were my random thoughts: This is a scatter plot with compounds giving more than 90% inhibition were a burgundy color and those with less were given a green color. There’s also a dashed line indicating the 90% threshold. It took me a minute or two to notice that the x-axis is meaningless. It’s likely the order of the compounds in their database (there seems to be a non-random pattern to the data about 3/4th the way across the axis). I also noticed that there’s no line on the x-axis, but there is a line at zero. Those are the parts of the figures, described in a way that you could probably use to make a similar looking figure with any tool. Now, how would we do this in R? Let’s start with the data. I assume that the data will be a data frame with two columns, one for the compound name ( I do everything in ggplot2 nowadays, so I start thinking about what geom I’ll use. Probably Next, I’d think about the colors. I’d use Let’s move on to the x-axis and the two lines. First, I’d use the Now let’s think about the y-axis. By default we might get the values on the y-axis that the figure already has. But to be safe, we can use I think that’s everything, right? I’d encourage you to go back through that narrative and assess what you do and don’t understand. Then look at online R resources, including my Riffomonas materials (MinimalR and generalR) and the R Graphics Cookbook for examples of how to use the new concepts. Finally, see if you can generate the figure yourself using some simulated data. The code below should be close enough to what you need:
Please let me know how this works out for you! Also, if you have a favorite figure that you'd love to see me break down, reply to this email and I'll see about using it in a future newsletter
|
Hey folks, I appreciated the emails I received from people after last week’s newsletter. I hope that even if people didn’t agree with what I had to say, it was thought-provoking. Regardless of how a plot is made - R, Prism, Excel (gasp!), or AI (oh my!) - we need to train our eyes and sense of taste to make the most compelling visualization of our data. If you’re interested in working with me on an individual or group level to achieve this goal, let me know. I am offering consultation...
Hey folks, If you’ve watched any of my livestreams when someone asks why I don’t get ChatGPT or something to do a task for me, you probably saw a pained expression come across my face. Part of me dies every time someone tells me that they used some LLM chatbot to solve a problem. I have many reasons for despising the fascination with AI-based tools. I even wrote a commentary that I submitted to mBio in the fall of 2024. Yes, I wrote it. By hand. Then I typed it. No really, I typed it on a...
Hey folks, It has been great to see the high level of engagement with my weekly critique videos on YouTube. I have really enjoyed making them and have learned a lot about current practices in data visualization. The one problem with these videos is that they’re a bit like an autopsy. We can figure out what went well or what didn’t work in a published figure. But we can’t do much to improve the published figure. What if we could do critiques before submitting our papers, preparing a...