|
Hey folks! Here in the US, vaccines continue to be a hot button issue. I feel like this issue is really an amalgamation of multiple issues including the decline in respect for authority figures, frustration with COVID, inability to assess risk at a personal level, and parents feeling like they are losing rights. Do people really want their kids to get sick unnecessarily? I doubt it. It’s also in the news because the Secretary of Health and Human Services is a vaccine skeptic/denier with many odd ideas. Some of these trends are seen in a recent poll done between the Washington Post and the Kaiser Family Foundation (i.e., KFF). Because the report on the KFF is free for all to access and the news article on the Washington Post is not, I’ll share the KFF version of this week’s figure. The report has two general types of plots. Ones with this columnar style and another with horizontal stacked bar plots. I’ve done stacked bar plots recently. So, I’ll roll with this columnar style of bar plot. This plot has a few interesting things that I had to think about how to implement in R. First, the main plot is a set of bar plots that are laid out horizontally. That’s not too hard to achieve. Map the percent of parents who think it is very or somewhat important for children to be vaccinated to the x-axis and each group of people to the x-axis. But what about the four columns for each disease? I’d use Second, the numeric text in each bar has some nice formatting to think about how I’d implement. The font appears to be bolded similar to how the group titles are bolded. Also, the MMR and flu percentages are white, except when the percentage is below 40%. I’d likely use a Third, the title have some interesting things going on. At the top there’s a “tag” indicating “Figure 2”. We can actually set this with the Finally, the KFF and The Washington Post have a logo in the bottom right corner. I think we’ve done this in the past with What do you think? I’d challenge you to see if you can come up with a similar overview for the horizontal bar plots in the KFF report. Let me know how it goes!
|
Hey folks, It has been great to see the high level of engagement with my weekly critique videos on YouTube. I have really enjoyed making them and have learned a lot about current practices in data visualization. The one problem with these videos is that they’re a bit like an autopsy. We can figure out what went well or what didn’t work in a published figure. But we can’t do much to improve the published figure. What if we could do critiques before submitting our papers, preparing a...
Hey folks, This week I want to share with you a figure that resembles many a type of figure that I see in a lot of genomics papers. I’d consider it a data visualization meme - kind of like how you’re “required” to have a stacked bar plot if you’re doing microbiome research or a dynamite plot if you’re publishing in Nature :) This figure was included in the paper, “Impact of intensive control on malaria population genomics under elimination settings in Southeast Asia” that was published...
Hey folks! I hope you enjoyed last week’s series on the radial volcano plot (newsletter, critique video, livestream). I think it did a good job of illustrating the various reasons I think it’s valuable to recreate figures, even if we don’t like how they display the data. Something I didn’t really emphasize in last week’s newsletter was that by recreating a figure, we can make sure that the data are legit. I’m surprised by the number of signals I’ve been finding where authors using tools like...