|
Hey folks! Here in the US, vaccines continue to be a hot button issue. I feel like this issue is really an amalgamation of multiple issues including the decline in respect for authority figures, frustration with COVID, inability to assess risk at a personal level, and parents feeling like they are losing rights. Do people really want their kids to get sick unnecessarily? I doubt it. It’s also in the news because the Secretary of Health and Human Services is a vaccine skeptic/denier with many odd ideas. Some of these trends are seen in a recent poll done between the Washington Post and the Kaiser Family Foundation (i.e., KFF). Because the report on the KFF is free for all to access and the news article on the Washington Post is not, I’ll share the KFF version of this week’s figure. The report has two general types of plots. Ones with this columnar style and another with horizontal stacked bar plots. I’ve done stacked bar plots recently. So, I’ll roll with this columnar style of bar plot. This plot has a few interesting things that I had to think about how to implement in R. First, the main plot is a set of bar plots that are laid out horizontally. That’s not too hard to achieve. Map the percent of parents who think it is very or somewhat important for children to be vaccinated to the x-axis and each group of people to the x-axis. But what about the four columns for each disease? I’d use Second, the numeric text in each bar has some nice formatting to think about how I’d implement. The font appears to be bolded similar to how the group titles are bolded. Also, the MMR and flu percentages are white, except when the percentage is below 40%. I’d likely use a Third, the title have some interesting things going on. At the top there’s a “tag” indicating “Figure 2”. We can actually set this with the Finally, the KFF and The Washington Post have a logo in the bottom right corner. I think we’ve done this in the past with What do you think? I’d challenge you to see if you can come up with a similar overview for the horizontal bar plots in the KFF report. Let me know how it goes!
|
Hey folks, It’s great to be back sending out this newsletter and posting videos! I hope you had a chance to check out the critique and livestream that I posted earlier this week. To be honest, I almost didn’t cover these figures because I truly strive to be constructive in this newsletter and in my content. Please feel free to email me if you think I should pull together a more formal description of the issues in the original paper to send to the authors before sending out to Nature...
Hey folks, It turns out that I sent out last week’s newsletter a week earlier than I should have. I had every intention of posting a critique video on Monday and doing a livestream on Wednesday. Alas, I didn’t totally have control of my schedule and neither video got up. Regardless, I’m glad I sent the newsletter out last week because it got me going. Inertia is a powerful thing. If we never start - even if it’s a false start - we will never get going. Rest assured that the videos will come...
Hey folks! I’m excited to be firing up the newsletter and YouTube feed again for the academic year. I hope you all had a great summer and were able to get a lot done while enjoying the opportunity to rest a bit. This summer I was able to finally resubmit and publish a manuscript I’ve been working on for a few years to rarefaction. This is now my third paper on rarefaction. Don’t worry, it’s the same story. If you are analyzing microbiome data, please use rarefaction. This paper raised a few...