|
Hey folks! This week I have a figure for you from the New York Times based on a poll they did with Siena that describes Americans’ sentiments concerning Israel’s actions in their war with Gaza. What does it say to me? This plot is saying that more Americans think that Israel is intentionally killing civilians than they did in December 2023. The change in percentage of people in the other categories seems to decrease accordingly. What do you like? I love slope plots! I think they’re a great strategy for showing the change in a variable between two time points. As always, I am a fan of the NY Times minimalist aesthetic to plots. What don’t you like? Although the war has been in the news for several years now, I’m not sure that Americans - in general - have a very good sense of what’s going on or how Israel is waging the war. This somewhat comes through in the percentage that don’t have an opinion. For December 2023 the three categories only add to 72% and for September 2025 they add to 81%. I feel like that’s a big pool of people with no opinion. How would I make this in R? Good question! Several things stand out to me. First, the slope plot itself. There are lines and points at the end of the lines. I imagine having a data frame with three columns - date, sentiment, and percentage. I’d map the date to the x-axis and the percentage to the y-axis. Then I’d group and color the lines by the sentiment. We can draw the lines with Second, the points and lines are labelled. The plot includes the percentage of respondents with each of the three sentiments at each date. The text label uses a bold font for “Intentionally” and “Unintentionally” and a regular font for the third category. I actually forget if I can vectorize the Third, I already mentioned the x-axis line. I’ll need to figure out how to get the x-axis text to not be centered under the tick. Again, I’m not sure if I can vectorize the Finally, they have some fun stuff going on with their titles and captions! I count three bits of text above the plot. Within What do you think about this plot? I’d love to get your insights. It’s likely you have an idea that is better than mine or at least having a try at. Stay tuned for a future YouTube video when I try to implement this figure.
|
Hey folks, It’s great to be back sending out this newsletter and posting videos! I hope you had a chance to check out the critique and livestream that I posted earlier this week. To be honest, I almost didn’t cover these figures because I truly strive to be constructive in this newsletter and in my content. Please feel free to email me if you think I should pull together a more formal description of the issues in the original paper to send to the authors before sending out to Nature...
Hey folks, It turns out that I sent out last week’s newsletter a week earlier than I should have. I had every intention of posting a critique video on Monday and doing a livestream on Wednesday. Alas, I didn’t totally have control of my schedule and neither video got up. Regardless, I’m glad I sent the newsletter out last week because it got me going. Inertia is a powerful thing. If we never start - even if it’s a false start - we will never get going. Rest assured that the videos will come...
Hey folks! I’m excited to be firing up the newsletter and YouTube feed again for the academic year. I hope you all had a great summer and were able to get a lot done while enjoying the opportunity to rest a bit. This summer I was able to finally resubmit and publish a manuscript I’ve been working on for a few years to rarefaction. This is now my third paper on rarefaction. Don’t worry, it’s the same story. If you are analyzing microbiome data, please use rarefaction. This paper raised a few...