|
Hey folks! This week I have a figure for you from the New York Times based on a poll they did with Siena that describes Americans’ sentiments concerning Israel’s actions in their war with Gaza. What does it say to me? This plot is saying that more Americans think that Israel is intentionally killing civilians than they did in December 2023. The change in percentage of people in the other categories seems to decrease accordingly. What do you like? I love slope plots! I think they’re a great strategy for showing the change in a variable between two time points. As always, I am a fan of the NY Times minimalist aesthetic to plots. What don’t you like? Although the war has been in the news for several years now, I’m not sure that Americans - in general - have a very good sense of what’s going on or how Israel is waging the war. This somewhat comes through in the percentage that don’t have an opinion. For December 2023 the three categories only add to 72% and for September 2025 they add to 81%. I feel like that’s a big pool of people with no opinion. How would I make this in R? Good question! Several things stand out to me. First, the slope plot itself. There are lines and points at the end of the lines. I imagine having a data frame with three columns - date, sentiment, and percentage. I’d map the date to the x-axis and the percentage to the y-axis. Then I’d group and color the lines by the sentiment. We can draw the lines with Second, the points and lines are labelled. The plot includes the percentage of respondents with each of the three sentiments at each date. The text label uses a bold font for “Intentionally” and “Unintentionally” and a regular font for the third category. I actually forget if I can vectorize the Third, I already mentioned the x-axis line. I’ll need to figure out how to get the x-axis text to not be centered under the tick. Again, I’m not sure if I can vectorize the Finally, they have some fun stuff going on with their titles and captions! I count three bits of text above the plot. Within What do you think about this plot? I’d love to get your insights. It’s likely you have an idea that is better than mine or at least having a try at. Stay tuned for a future YouTube video when I try to implement this figure.
|
Hey folks! Before launching into this week’s visualization, I’m looking for a bit of feedback. Since November, I’ve settled into a new routine with this newsletter and the YouTube channel. Each week this newsletter introduces a visualization at a 30,000 ft view or discusses a specific topic in some depth (example). The following Monday I post a video critiquing the visualization (example). Then on Wednesday (or Tuesday like this past week), I livestream a video where I recreate the...
Hey folks! I just got back from a seminar. I’m still trying to stretch out my eyes from straining to see the small text on each slide! If you don’t know why I’m brining this up, then you must have missed the videos I posted earlier this week. I was discussing the factors we should consider when converting figures designed for papers to figures designed to a slide deck. You can see me critique a figure from my own lab here and the livestream where I refactor the figure can be found here. I’d...
Hey folks, I was a student-invited speaker at the Syracuse University Biology department this week. It was great to meet with them and hear how they are benefiting from these newsletters and my videos. As much as I love posting newsletters and videos, seeing people light up at ideas, laugh at my jokes, and tell me how they are using what I teach them is like jet fuel. I actually gave two talks. One talk covered what I’ve learned about data visualization by critiquing, recreating, and remaking...