|
Hey folks, This week I hosted the first live ensemble programming session. It went really well. We had fun and learned a lot. If you’d like to get in on these types of sessions, let me know and I’ll be sure you get a special invitation for the next series. I really believe that this form of instruction is critical to making the material learned in compact workshops stick for the long term. I hope you had fun working with the broken axis chart last week! This week I want you to look at Figures 5 of “Strategies for effective high pressure germination or inactivation of Bacillus spores involving nisin ” by Rosa Heydenreich and colleagues, which was recently published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology. You probably would like a little context. This is from a paper looking at using pressure to get bacteria to form spores or leave the spore state. The analysis was done before and after a heat treatment (as indicated in the legend) using four different methods (across the x-axis). They measured the number of spores observed for each condition and expressed it as the log fraction of the number of the number of spores put into the experiment (No = 10^9). The error bars indicate the standard deviation across at least three independent experiments. What type of plot is this? What stands out to you about this figure? What do you like about it? What don’t you like about it? Can you outline the steps you would take to generate the figure? What are some of the steps you aren’t sure about and would like to learn? These are questions that I’d strongly encourage you to ask about any visual you are looking at because I think they’ll help you to develop your “taste” in data visualizations and strengthen you skills in generating those visualizations. This is a bar plot. Here are five things that caught my eye. First, this bar plot has it’s x-axis at the top and descends into negative log values. Second, they have hashing in the bars for the “after heat” category. Third, their legend is below the plot, has italics, and has a box around it. Fourth, they only have horizontal grid lines with a thicker, dashed grid line to indicate the limit of detection at -8. Finally, I noticed that the tick marks move into plot rather than default of plot. Here’s some data for you to experiment with:
First, let’s talk about the bar plot. You may be tempted to use The second eye catcher is that they have diagonal lines for the bars representing what happened after the heat treatment. I think this general look comes to us from many years of using M$Excel. My personal preference would be to leave out the diagonal hashing since I think it unnecessarily clutters the bars. Why not use the two shades of blue and call it a day? Anyway, there is a cool looking Third, they were able to format their treatment categories so that they could nicely tuck the legend on the left side of the axis. How’d they do that? I’d likely use Fourth, they have done some interesting things with their grid lines. If you use the Finally, the plot is doing interesting things with the x-axis ticks by having them go into the plot and by removing them from the y-axis. How would you do that? If your mind went to There’s a lot of cool stuff going on in a relatively simple plot! I’m not sure what software they used to make this plot, but it has some really nice points. The more I looked at this figure, the more things I noticed are different from the default As always if you have a cool plot you’d like to share with me for a future newsletter, feel free to reply to this email. Oh yeah, that
|
Hey folks, Did you know that you can do statistics in R? HA! Of course it is. As the first sentence of its Wikipedia entry says, “R is a programming language for statistical computing and data visualization”. I rarely discuss using R for statistical analysis and focus far more attention on the data visualization power of R. This week, I’d like to share a set of panels from a figure in a paper recently published in Nature, “Lymph node environment drives FSP1 targetability in metastasizing...
Hey folks, I’ve really enjoyed the flow of combining these newsletters with a Monday critique video, a Wednesday recreation video, and occasionally a Friday remake video. A few weeks in, I feel pretty good about our ability to engage in constructive critiques. Of course, we have to train ourselves (myself included) to use those tools and not just resort to immediate and emotional responses - “I hate that plot”. We need to engage, get in the head of the original creator, and try to understand...
Hey folks! I’m appreciating the positive feedback on Monday critique videos. They’re a lot of fun to think through and make. I think I might start looking at figures that are drawn from the scientific literature since many of you found out about me from my science work. Let me know if there are plots or practices that you’d like to see me talk about. I’ll see if I can work them into the queue. Also, if you’re working on developing figures for a presentation, poster, or paper and would like to...