|
Hey folks, I’m really excited to be offering a 1-day (6 hours) data visualization workshop on May 9th. It will cover the basics of ggplot2. If you’ve been following along this newsletter for anytime, you know I’ve thought a lot about how we learn. A critical element of learning is to create a mental model that we can hang ideas on to flesh out our understanding of a concept. The “grammar of graphics” is one such mental model for building plots. It is instantiated in ggplot2 - that’s the “gg” in the name! My goal is to help you develop that mental model so that you can leave the workshop understanding the ggplot2 framework and add to your understanding of the model as you go off on your own journey learning more advanced topics. You can learn more and register by clicking the button below. Feel free to email me if you have any questions. Let me know if you’d like to see other one or part day workshops offered related to the types of things I discuss in the newsletter or over on YouTube. I’ve been swamped the last couple of weeks with a variety of things. This is keeping me from my regular posting of videos to YouTube - sorry! I do plan on getting back on track soon. However, I may be limited to one a week rather than the recent two a week cadence. I have too many things that are falling by the side that I need to get caught back up before putting more effort into the channel. Hopefully, you’ll understand. If you’re like many of us in the US, we’ve been getting whiplash trying to understand the current status of the tariff war, why it’s happening, and what the effects are. This has been quite the week for the Trump administration which seems to be trying to one up itself each week with things it can do to be unpredictable. I’ve been struck by a few of the visualizations coming out of the New York Times describing the impact of the administrations policies on the US and international stock markets. Here are two visuals they posted in an article last week: I’ll focus on the first plot and encourage you to think through the second on your own - they’re somewhat related. The first is a line plot showing the closing value of the S&P 500, a barometer of the 500 leading companies on the US stock exchange. There are breaks in the lines indicating the weekends and holidays. Each week’s worth of data has a shaded rectangle in the background that is colored by whether the week ended lower than the previous week. So how would I pull this off? I see three major components: the data, the lines, and the rectangles. To get the data, I would use the {quantmod} package. This package has a function called To generate the line plot with dots and breaks for weekends and holidays there are two strategies I’d consider. Normally, To generate the shaded background, I’d use I think the data, the lines, and the rectangles are the big parts of the plot to figure out. Other things would include: (1) the horizontal grid lines running on top of the rectangles, but behind the lines; (2) commas in the y-axis values; (3) placement of the month below the first date of the month and returning data every two weeks; and (4) getting “Orange bars” to be orange and bolded in the subtitle. If you’ve been following along over the past few months you likely have an idea for how we can do each of these. Don’t forget to give the second plot the same treatment! What do you think the hard parts are in that plot?
|
Hey folks, Did you know that you can do statistics in R? HA! Of course it is. As the first sentence of its Wikipedia entry says, “R is a programming language for statistical computing and data visualization”. I rarely discuss using R for statistical analysis and focus far more attention on the data visualization power of R. This week, I’d like to share a set of panels from a figure in a paper recently published in Nature, “Lymph node environment drives FSP1 targetability in metastasizing...
Hey folks, I’ve really enjoyed the flow of combining these newsletters with a Monday critique video, a Wednesday recreation video, and occasionally a Friday remake video. A few weeks in, I feel pretty good about our ability to engage in constructive critiques. Of course, we have to train ourselves (myself included) to use those tools and not just resort to immediate and emotional responses - “I hate that plot”. We need to engage, get in the head of the original creator, and try to understand...
Hey folks! I’m appreciating the positive feedback on Monday critique videos. They’re a lot of fun to think through and make. I think I might start looking at figures that are drawn from the scientific literature since many of you found out about me from my science work. Let me know if there are plots or practices that you’d like to see me talk about. I’ll see if I can work them into the queue. Also, if you’re working on developing figures for a presentation, poster, or paper and would like to...